How Sustainable Is Harvest & Mill?

Founded in 2012, Harvest & Mill produces USA-grown organic cotton from seed to stitch.

Established in 2012 in Berkeley, USA, Harvest & Mill makes USA-grown organic cotton clothing with a fully domestic supply chain from “seed to stitch.”

1. Environmental
Sustainability

Harvest & Mill’s core environmental strategy is a fully USA-based organic cotton supply chain, plus undyed / low-impact dye options, and plastic-free packaging. The brand shares many process details, but it publishes limited primary data (e.g., total annual emissions, supplier names/addresses, or independent verification files).
IMPACT AREA 01

Materials
& Sourcing

  1. Harvest & Mill states that it uses 100% organic cotton grown in the USA across its cotton supply. 
  2. It states its supply chain is fully domestic: cotton grown, yarn spun/knit, and sewing done in the USA, with sewing within approximately 15 miles of its Berkeley studio. 
  3. They work directly with organic cotton farmers, heritage mills, and family-owned factories, and claim “fully traceable” production from farm to sewing. 
  4. Harvest & Mil highlights composting/byproducts at the farm level.
  5. The brand makes comparative impact claims (e.g., “70% less GHG than other sustainable brands,” “53% less energy,” “50% less water”) without sharing a public dataset, product list, or third-party-reviewed report in the provided sources. For transparency, it would be good if they shared, for example, the underlying methodology file. 
IMPACT AREA 02

Climate
& Emissions

  1. Harvest & Mill states it measures impacts using a “globally accepted analysis methodology” and calculates impact metrics per product across its manufacturing process. 
  2. The brand claims a 5× shorter travel distance, stating products travel 34,234 miles less than other sustainable clothing due to the domestic supply chain. 
  3. It states that they try to reduce carbon emissions as much as possible, and then they try to offset 100% of the remaining footprint from manufacturing, supply-chain transportation, studio footprint, and shipped orders.
  4. It names offset projects: Garcia River Forest reforestation and Capricorn Ridge Wind Farm, and includes project-level impact statements. 
  5. They do not show gross emissions totals, a reduction target, or annual progress reporting. That makes it harder to assess real-world decarbonization. 

IMPACT AREA 03

Water
& Chemicals

  1. Harvest & Mill emphasizes undyed and unbleached “natural finish” fabric options, and says many items are dye-free and bleach-free, including naturally colored cotton options. 
  2. Their black fabric uses low-impact fiber reactive dyes in the USA, and they link this to EPA wastewater discharge laws and chemical safety regulations.
  3. It states its fabrics are free of specific chemical groups (e.g., PFAS, azo dyes, formaldehyde, phthalates, heavy metals, etc.). 
  4. It frames “non-toxic” as enabled by avoiding wholesalers and knowing where fabrics are made. 
  5. In the sources provided, there is no lab testing summary, certification list (like OEKO-TEX), or public test results to verify it. 
IMPACT AREA 04

Circularity
& Waste

  1. Harvest & Mill states it designs patterns to minimize off-cuts, and that extra fabric is repurposed or recycled, with a claim that none ends up in landfill. 
  2. Harvest & Mill products are compostable or recyclable (organic cotton garments and paper packaging). They recommend composting/repurposing at end-of-life “where appropriate.”
  3. Packaging is described as plastic-free, using recycled paper materials designed to be recycled or composted.

2. Social
Sustainability

Harvest & Mill links social responsibility to a fully USA-based supply chain and claims legally enforceable labor protections. It describes commitments, but it does not publish worker counts, wage benchmarks, or facility-level audit results in the provided sources.
IMPACT AREA 05

Animal
Welfare

  1. They do not use animal product trims or tags. 
  2. Harvest & Mill claims its product line is PETA-approved. For clarity, it must be mentioned that PETA approval is an advocacy-based label and does not cover labor, environment, or supply chain auditing.
IMPACT AREA 06

Workplace
Practices

  1. The sources provided do not include workforce size, demographics, pay ranges, benefits, or health-and-safety performance indicators for Harvest & Mill’s internal team.
  2. The brand states it works with nearby sewing factories and “knows the people who sew” its clothing through regular visits, but does not provide employee metrics or third-party verification.
IMPACT AREA 07

Supply Chain
Workers’ Rights

  1. Harvest & Mill claims that everyone in its supply chain receives fair wages, safe working conditions, legal right to organize, and discrimination protection, arguing for enforceability because production is in the USA.
  2. According to Harvest & Mill,  sewing is done through independent, family-owned factories in Oakland and San Francisco, and it regularly visits these facilities.